The following essay explains the methodologies used to compile the tables in the Resources section of the Constitution Annotated website.
Table of Cases
The Table of Cases is a comprehensive list of all cases cited in the Constitution Annotated alongside the Constitution Annotated essays in which the citattions are located. It is not a Table of Authorities so it does not include citations to other types of authorities such as books, law journals, periodicals, reports, and others. Case names are abbreviated according to The Bluebook. 1
Read the Table of Cases.
Table of Supreme Court Decisions Overruled by Subsequent Decisions
This table lists decisions that the Supreme Court subsequently overruled. In accordance with the underlying purposes of the Constitution Annotated, this list is intended to provide a consistent, objective assessment of changes in Court precedent. While Justices 2 and commentators 3 frequently assert in legal debates that a given decision has overruled a prior decision, such assertions may be speculative or reflect subjective interpretations, resulting in diverse opinions on whether a given case has, in fact, been overruled. 4 Oftentimes, knowledge of the Court's subsequent actions is necessary to determine whether and the extent to which a particular case can be said to have overturned precedent. 5
In order to ensure that cases are identified as overruled in a consistent and objective manner, the Constitution Annotated adopted fixed criteria. Specifically, for a decision to be listed as overruled, a majority of the Court must have explicitly stated, in a subsequent decision, that the case has been overruled 6 or used language that is functionally equivalent. 7 While this approach may result in a list that is narrower than similar lists in other sources, it provides consistent and objective treatment, adhering to the Court's repeated statements that only the High Court has "the prerogative of overruling its own decisions." 8
The table includes all decisions that the Court has overruled on any question of law, constitutional or otherwise. It also includes decisions that the Court has only partially overruled or otherwise qualified. For example, in United States v. Hatter, the Court overruled Evans v. Gore "insofar as [Evans] holds that the Compensation Clause forbids Congress to apply a generally applicable, nondiscriminatory tax to the salaries of federal judges, whether or not they were appointed before enactment of the tax."  9 Similarly, in Fulton Corp. v. Faulkner, the Court distinguished an earlier decision's treatment of the Equal Protection and Commerce Clauses, stating: "To the extent that Darnell evaluated a discriminatory state tax under the Equal Protection Clause, time simply has passed it by . . . . [W]hile cases like Kidd and Darnell may still be authorities under the Equal Protection Clause, they are no longer good law under the Commerce Clause." 10
This approach necessarily excludes certain cases that other sources may list as overruled. For example, the table does not include cases that the Court distinguished or limited 11 or cases identified by concurring or dissenting Justices or commentators as overruled,  12 unless such cases have also been expressly overruled by a majority of the Court. Similarly, cases that the Court treats as discredited, but has not expressly overruled, are not included in the list. 13 In addition, in order to avoid imputing findings to the Court with respect to particular cases, the list does not include cases that, arguably, rely on overruled precedent, unless the Court has also expressly identified such cases as overruled.
The table does not include cases where the Court issued a ruling on the merits after having split evenly on the issue previously, 14 or where the Court reversed an earlier procedural ruling (e.g., lifting a previously issued stay). 15 While some sources list such cases, 16 the Constitution Annotated does not. The table also does not address subsequent developments, such as the enactment of statutory or constitutional amendments, which may functionally "reverse" the Court's decisions. 17 In other words, the list focuses on the Supreme Court's actions and, in particular, the frequency and manner in which the Court has reversed itself. As such, the list does not necessarily reflect the current state of the law on a given issue.
For purposes of this table, decisions are identified as overruling when the High Court characterizes them as such. While it is not uncommon for the Court to note that an earlier decision has been "eroded by . . . subsequent decisions," 18 or "cannot be reconciled with later decisions of th[e] Court," 19 cases that the Court may consider to have effectuated such "erosion" or legal change are not included in the list unless the Court expressly found such cases to overrule precedent.
Similarly, with overruled decisions, the table includes only decisions the Court has expressly identified as overruled. While the Court often refers to a decision by name when overruling it—stating, for example, "Haddock v. Haddock is overruled . . . ," 20 or "We now expressly overrule Spaziano and Hildwin . . ." 21—in some cases, the Court may identify several decisions related to a particular legal doctrine and then state that the doctrine is overruled. 22 In such circumstances, cases that the Court expressly identifies in the overruling decision are listed, insofar as the overruling decision evidences that the Court contemplated such cases when deeming the doctrine overruled. Decisions that may rely on an overruled doctrine, but are not identified by the Court as such, are not listed in order to avoid imputing findings to the Court that it did not intend.
The table was compiled by searching the LEXIS database for all Supreme Court decisions that use the word "overrule" in the headnotes, syllabus, or text of the Court's opinion. 23 The results were then reviewed to ascertain the Court's exact meaning with respect to its earlier decisions. Decisions supported by a majority of the Court that expressly overruled an earlier decision or used functionally equivalent language were listed in the table. These findings were also cross-checked with other sources to ensure that the search had captured any relevant results. 24
The table is arranged in chronological order by the date of the overruling decision. For each overruling decision listed, the table gives (1) the name of the overruling decision; (2) the date of the overruling decision; (3) the name of the overruled decision; and (4) the date of the overruled decision.
Table of Laws Held Unconstitutional in Whole or in Part by the Supreme Court
This list is undergoing significant revisions and will be updated more fully as broader review of the Constitution Annotated continues. This Table provides preliminary revisions to prior versions of the table, listing Supreme Court decisions from October Term 1971 to October Term 2016 that invalidated a law on constitutional grounds. It includes cases invalidating federal laws, state constitutional or statutory provisions, and local laws. The list does not include cases in which the Supreme Court held that a state or local law was preempted, as those cases tend to hinge on an interpretation of positive federal law as opposed to a substantive interpretation of a particular constitutional provision. Moreover, the list generally includes only cases in which the Court held that a statute was facially unconstitutional and does not include as-applied challenges. In addition to giving the case citations, the Table indicates the term in which the opinion was released, the opinion’s author, and the general subject matter of the case. The list also briefly summarizes the law that was held unconstitutional and identifies what portion of the U.S. Constitution the law violated.
Table of Supreme Court Justices
The Table of Supreme Court Justices lists all Justices who have served or are currently serving on the Supreme Court along with brief biographical information and key decisions. 25
Read the Table of Supreme Court Justices.